Tough Love

Jean Carroll Nolan

Jean Nolan Banner

“The intensity inherent in such relationships is wearing, demanding in the extreme, and likely to produce missteps and strange, if not actually bad, judgment. But, it is glorious. Ashley Wilkes may be virtuous and upstanding, but it is Rhett Butler whose blood sings to Scarlett’s.”— Jean Carroll Nolan

More Light

By Jean Carroll Nolan

 “Tristan and Isolde (Death),” by Rogelio de Egusquiza y Barrena (1845 –1915).

“Tristan and Isolde (Death),” by Rogelio de Egusquiza y Barrena (1845 –1915).

Jean Nolan

SEASIDE California—(Weekly Hubris)—February 2018—As I write, it is almost February, and all the shelves that only a month ago were filled with red and green candles and papers and cards are now jammed with red and white and pink expressions of love. Hearts and candy abound. Valentine cards can be found for everyone from grandchildren to pets. Googling the holiday expenditure is sobering. We learn from ABC news that in 2017, Valentine’s Day spending on jewelry, flowers, and other goodies was expected to top 18.2 billion dollars, a figure surely equal to the GNP of a small nation here or there. As celebrated in 21st-century America, this feast of a martyr and saint is, like the Christmas holiday that precedes it, fairly well wrapped up in consumerism.

The origins of the holiday are difficult to pin down. The Catholic Church recognizes no fewer than three St Valentines, all martyrs, two of whom were executed for crimes against the Roman Empire, each on February 14, in different years, in the 3rd century AD. It is difficult to suss out which one was the Valentine who gave birth to our little spending orgy. In the 5th century, Pope Gelasius I, seeking a way to superimpose the traditions of the Church on the pagan tradition of Lupercalia, decreed that the holidays were one and the same. This must have been mystifying to both Christians and pagans; how, after all, does one merge a feast of a martyred saint with a pagan party in which young women are flogged with the skins of recently sacrificed dogs and goats? Another proof that religion is often challenging.

Whatever the origins, there is no denying the inherent sexiness of Valentine’s Day. I say sexiness as opposed to romanticism, an entirely different concept. Born (possibly) of a fertility ritual, Valentine’s Day is sacred to lovers. Yes, of course, you also give candy to your grandmother and the mail carrier, but the mall jewelry stores and the florists don’t thrive on familial affection but, rather, on the specific, compelling attraction between two people.  Underneath the romantic fluff of this holiday is a basic truth. We are, most of us, drawn to one specific other, whose appearance, smell, and outlook appeal to us on visceral levels. This is often decried as a shallow, physical attraction, and it certainly may be.

On the other hand, it can be the stuff of legends. Romeo and Juliet, Tristan and Isolde, Paris and Helen, are not famous because of their intellectual connection, but because of their very fundamental, very physical love. The intensity inherent in such relationships is wearing, demanding in the extreme, and likely to produce missteps and strange, if not actually bad, judgment. But, it is glorious. Ashley Wilkes may be virtuous and upstanding, but it is Rhett Butler whose blood sings to Scarlett’s. Romanticism prevents her from recognizing the dictates of her flesh, and thus dooms a handful of characters to miserable, unfulfilled lives.

Love, gritty, physical, difficult, painful, ecstatic, can be, it seems to me, the end result of the Man-is-he-cute moment. But, when you fall in love, advice gets stuck in romance. When I married my husband, literally a half century ago, I was 17. I knew nothing about love as I now understand it. He just left me breathless. And every kind, older woman who advised me said, in essence, this is just a physical thing. You don’t really understand what love is about.

And that was absolutely true. On our wedding day, during the vows, I had a flashing moment of wondering if “in sickness or in health” meant that you stuck it out with someone who had the ‘flu. My ignorance was astounding.

We were all about the physical, he and I, and his going to war just made the whole electric current running between us more intense. It may not have been romantic, but love grew out of it, nonetheless. We made mistakes, we hurt each other, we said foolish and cruel things, but we also cherished each other, comforted each other, and each had the other’s back. We have a lively intellectual relationship, as well, and we both love animals, love to sing. But our loyalty and absolute fealty to each other was born of nothing more elegant than the fact that I love his scent, and he loves my hair, clean and free of sprays or gels.

Valentine’s Day is not about death and sorrow and isolation and struggle, but it should be. It is not the flower-petals-in-the-bathtub, Bechet on the CD player, filet and a nice Pinot Noir evenings that make a marriage. It is the desire to become stronger, to nurture the ability to be yet more sensitive, yet more empathetic, while retaining a sense of self, that is, it seems to me, necessary. To commit to reflecting back to the other the best version of him- or herself, a mirror of virtues rather than a catalogue of weaknesses. For me, all the difficulties were born, and borne, for reasons having much more to do with the Lupercalia than the more staid, modern, “romantic” Valentine’s Day.

A friend, much younger, said, upon reading the poem below, “So, whatever doesn’t kill you makes you softer?” which about sums it up.

Happy Valentine’s Day.

“Satã observando o amor de Adão e Eva,” by William Blake (1757–1827).

“Satã observando o amor de Adão e Eva,” by William Blake (1757–1827).

“Tough Love”

By Jean Carroll Nolan

If hearts were sold in slices, neatly placed
on poreless Styrofoam, under plasticine,
like liver, calamari, organ meats,
then we would see their tough and sinewy fiber,
and know how necessary is the mallet,
the back of the knife-blade pounding against the flesh,
creating blood-filled ruts in muscled tissue;
small, salted intersections that tenderize.

Jean Carroll Nolan

About Jean Carroll Nolan

Jean Carroll Nolan lives in Seaside, California (next door to Monterey), with her husband of 46 years, two dogs, and too many books. She enjoys music (singing, listening, playing three chords on the guitar), reading, and writing poetry, thinking about working in the garden, and cooking on feast days. She reads a good deal, everything from military history to Robert Parker, and loves old films. She considers herself a liberal and a patriot, and sees no dichotomy there. She supports animal rescue projects (racehorses and pit bulls, in particular), volunteers with an adult literacy program, and believes courtesy and kindness have power to reshape the world. She adores her two adult children and her daughter-in-law, and is desperately in love with her grandchildren, Brody and Sarah, and her grand-dogs, Wayne and Murphy. She enjoys finding and appreciating the miraculous in the everyday. She first discovered this gift in subway stations in Chicago, observing former field mice who (amazingly) not only survived, but thrived on the track bed below the trains. (Author photos: John Nolan)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

13 Responses to Tough Love

  1. Will says:

    Ah! This may just be the best valentine I’ve read in years!

  2. Ross Konikoff says:

    Hi Jean,
    I love that you broke through the monetization of love and got to the meat of it. Real crazy strong inexplicable love for another person is my favorite topic in the world and you write about it beautifully.

  3. Your poem! Such an enormous truth embodied in such a compact and stringent way! Terrific graphics, too!

  4. Jean says:

    Will, thank you. It makes me so happy that you enjoyed it.

  5. Jean says:

    Ross, you said it so perfectly when you wrote, “Real crazy strong inexplicable love for another person…”. Yes. Exactly. Weird and wonderful. Thank you.

  6. Jean says:

    Claire, thank you very much. Riches indeed to receive praise from – gulp – a real poet. The graphics are courtesy of our dauntless editor, who always seems to find perfect art.

  7. Stacey Robertson says:

    I know someone who will appreciate this gory valentine…

  8. Jean says:

    Will, dear heart, in order to respond I had to wipe away the tears that fell reading yours. Thank you so much.
    Ross, I cannot tell you how much I enjoy your pieces. You are hilarious, smart and deliciously human. Thank you.
    Claire, your praise, (from a REAL poet), makes me very happy. Keep educating me with new poets. Thank you.
    Stacey, I cannot imagine to whom you may refer! I am just so tired of the martini-glass, sparkly shoes valentines. Thanks, and love.

  9. Jean says:

    Apologies to all who have commented, without receiving a response. As I wrote to Tim Bayer, my iPad, clearly having issues, needs a therapist. Sorry for the delay.

    Will, dear heart, in order to reply to you, I had to wipe away all the tears, of both joy and pain, that fell when I was reading your piece. Thank you so much.

    Ross, I simply cannot tell you how much I enjoy your pieces. You are truly funny, smart, and deliciously human. Love is my favorite topic, too. Thanks.

    Claire, your praise, from – gulp! – a real poet, makes me very, very happy. Please keep educating me with new minstrels. Thank you very much, indeed.

    Stacey, I cannot image to whom you refer. Ha. I was just so tired of the martini-glass, sparkly shoes variety of valentines. Thanks, for stopping by, for your kind comment, and for being you. Love.

  10. diana says:

    Jean, this is a masterpiece. What oft was said but ne’er so well expressed. And your poem is the cherry on the Valentine cake. Wonderful reading for tomorrow. And by the way the NYTimes ran a piece talking about the conflict some poor souls are having because Ash Wednesday and Valentine’s Day coincide this year for the first time in decades. Religion’s making things difficult again, it seems.

  11. Jean says:

    Diana, thank you so very much. It is a mutual admiration society, I assure you. I enjoy your work tremendously, and, despite being at best an indifferent cook, have managed to crank out enough of your recipes that my husband now wants feta and/or lemon on everything other than chocolate. So, I always enjoy your work, and love your husband’s stories. That said, I appreciate your comment, and just found the NYT article, and cracked up. The poor souls!

  12. Werner Christie says:

    Jean: Thanks for a great piece! I just love this :

    “…To commit to reflecting back to the other the best version of him- or herself, a mirror of virtues rather than a catalogue of weaknesses….”

    I thinks that sums it up: When you can build solidarity in times of adversity, love just grows slowly and solidly. Like an oak tre….

  13. Jean says:

    Werner, I am blushing! Thank you so much. I think you have also been married forever, so you get it. We are delighted to see you here. Come back for coffee anytime.

Leave a Reply

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>