Hubris

“An Everyday Story Of R.C. Pedophiles & Cover-Ups”

The Polemicist

by Michael House

Michael HouseLONDON, England—(Weekly Hubris)—4/5/10—Joseph Ratzinger goes under several aliases. He is called the “Pope,” the “Supreme Pontiff,” the “Holy Father.” A member of the Hitler Youth as a boy, he was the ideal candidate for the office he held before God chose him to be His Vicar on Earth: head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

His job was to discipline the Catholic clergy.

Ratzinger is said to be a reluctant ‘Pope.’ He is reported as having once revealed, “I prayed to God, ‘Please don’t do this to me’.” No doubt, many terrified, desperate children being sodomized by the ‘Christian’ priests under his charge have offered up similar prayers. If he doesn’t want to be Pope, the solution seems very simple.

Here is a brief summary of half a century (and no doubt hundreds of years before that) of secrecy and suppression of the truth—at least since 1074, when ‘Pope’ Gregory VII decreed that anyone to be ordained must first pledge celibacy.

—1962:  the Vatican wrote to every bishop enjoining the strictest secrecy in investigating sexual abuse allegations.

—1975: ‘Cardinal’ Sean Brady, leader of the Roman church in Ireland, investigated two cases of abuse by a ‘Father’ Brendan Smyth, Ireland’s most notorious pedophile priest.  The teenagers (one 14) involved were sworn to secrecy (and probably told they would go to Hell if they broke the oath.) Smyth continued to abuse children for nearly 20 years, until he was arrested in 1991 and fled across the border to the Republic. In 1997, he pleaded guilty to 74 charges of abusing children over 35 years.

—1980: ‘Cardinal’ Joseph Ratzinger chaired a meeting to discuss a known pedophile priest, ‘Father’ Peter Hullerman. The priest was given therapy and transferred to another parish. He was convicted of abuse in 1986. He was still an active priest until last month, when he was suspended for breaking a promise not to have contact with children.

—1996: Ratzinger was asked by the ‘Archbishop of Wisconsin’ to consent to the defrocking of a priest, ‘Father’ Lawrence C. Murphy, who had been accused of molesting up to 200 children between 1950 and 1974. Murphy appealed to Ratzinger for mercy and the inquiry was closed.

—2001: Ratzinger signed a document stating that child abuse cases should be dealt with behind closed doors in ‘canonical courts.’ He blames secularism and liberals within the church for these outbreaks of ‘sinfulness.’

—2002: Ratzinger’s predecessor, John Paul II, promotes ‘Cardinal’ Bernard Law after he resigned as ‘Bishop of Boston’ over the cover-up of sexual abuse by over one thousand (I,000) priests. Ratzinger is fast-tracking J P II for ‘sainthood.’

—2010: A group of victims appear on Italian TV claiming that two dozen priests, including the ‘Bishop’ of Verona, abused them over four decades at a school for the deaf in Verona. They described sodomy, masturbation and fondling. The current  ‘Bishop’ of Verona accused the former students of “hallucinating.” The allegations first surfaced last summer. No action was taken until last month.

—A conservative Catholic order, the ‘the Legionnaries of Christ’ was founded in 1941. Its founder was ‘Father’ Marcial Maciel Degollado of Mexico. The Legion shunned the media, while Maciel ordered his followers to take vows never to criticize him or any superior. He showered gifts on reactionary cardinals and bishops—money, fine wines, even a new car—to secure support for his order in the Catholic establishment. His mission was to ‘save the church from a corrupted world.’ Rich supporters enabled the Legion to amass assets of $650 million.

Maciel was found to be living a double life, molesting child seminarians for 40 years and fathering a daughter by a long-term mistress. ‘Pope’ John Paul II refused to investigate the allegations, first made in 1997 by former members of the Legion. JP said he ‘discerned’ Maciel’s innocence. In 2006, Maciel was finally ordered to retire to a life of “prayer and penitence.”

—The Church was quick to respond to evidence of a global, systematic cover-up of child abuse by Catholic priests. One of Ratzinger’s closest aides, ‘Cardinal’ Jose Martins, said, “You don’t wash your dirty laundry in public.” He blamed the media for the controversy and told the world that there was a “well-organized” conspiracy against the Church.

— ‘Bishop’ Ribaldi of Acerra said that the revelations marked the start of a war “between Satan and God.” (Oddly, he appears to be on the side of Satan.) One of the henchmen of frequenter-of-minors, Silvio Berlusconi, Italy’s foreign minister Franco Fratini, spoke of “scandalous and disgraceful” attacks on the Holy Father.

—One Christian Democrat politician said “For years, a Masonic-secularist offensive against Catholics has been under way.”

So, to a faith that: would rather let you die in childbirth than have an abortion; would rather let people in Africa die of AIDS than use a condom; condemns people to abject poverty rather than allowing them to plan their families; is responsible for thousands of deaths every year, we add: a faith that, although it hates gays, tolerates and covers up pedophilia in its priesthood.  . . .and when the truth comes out, the church screams conspiracy.

As I said two weeks ago, religion is poison.

John Humphrys is rather a hero of mine. Coming from a poor Welsh family and leaving school at 15, he became a reporter, foreign correspondent, quiz-master, pure food and ‘correct English’ campaigner, newsreader on radio and television and chief inquisitor of the political class. He presents the “Today” program on British radio several times a week.  Politicians frequently refuse to be interviewed by him. He can turn a lying pol (i.e. most of them) inside out in minutes.

The great man’s son married a Greek woman and now lives in Athens. A few years ago, on a walking tour of the Argolid, Humphrys saw a derelict cottage overlooking the sea. He loved the view and decided to buy the cottage and build a modern villa on the property. He also bought the olive trees on the land (or so he thought). His and his son’s encounters with Greek bureaucrats (who lead the world), Greek builders, engineers, fishermen, entrepreneurs (George W. Bush: “The trouble with the French, they have no word for entrepreneur”—fact), cats, wildlife and the Orthodox Church are hilariously described in Blue Skies and Black OlivesA Survivor’s Tale of Housebuilding and Peacock Chasing in Greece.  I recommend it very highly.

There—I’ve said something positive for once! You didn’t think I could, did you?

A much-loved British sports commentator died last week. His name was Harry Carpenter and he was a national institution in Britain. His speciality was boxing, and he was a friend and an early supporter of Muhammed Ali, Cassius Clay as he then was.

His other speciality was the faux pas. A total innocent, he would say things that anyone else would realize could not possibly be said on the air.

My personal favorite comes from the annual “Oxford and Cambridge Boat Race,” a venerable event, dating from 1829, involving my country’s two ancient universities. Every spring, two crews of eight, each captained by a ‘President,’ battle it out over 4 ½ miles of the River Thames. In 1977, after the race was over, Harry came out with the immortal observation:

“Ah, isn’t that nice—the wife of the Cambridge President is kissing the cox of the Oxford crew.”

We shall not look upon his like again.

Michael House, FRGS was born, of rural, peasant stock, in Somerset, England. He read law at Exeter College, Oxford and was elected President of the Oxford Union. In 1974, along with five colleagues, House started up a set of barristers' chambers in three little rooms in Lincoln's Inn, London, specializing in human rights and in representing the poor and dispossessed. The set now comprises 170 members and occupies a 17th-century building that was home to the only British Prime Minister to be assassinated (Spencer Perceval, 1812). In 1987, depressed by Mrs. Thatcher's third election victory, House fled to Greece for three years, where he was published in The Athenian and The Southeastern Review. He also there met his archaeologist wife, Diane. The pair returned to England in 1990 after a half-year, round-the-world trip, and settled in London and Northamptonshire. Since then, by way of escape from humdrum criminality, House has traveled in Tibet, Nepal, Sikkim, Ladakh, Uzbekistan, India, Pakistan, Turkey, Morocco, Syria, Jordan, Libya, Mongolia, Kashmir, and Sri Lanka, where only the stout walls of Galle Fort saved him and his spouse from being swept away by the tsunami. House returns to Greece, his second home, almost every year. He has written for, inter alia, History Today, the Universities Quarterly, the Sydney Morning Herald, and the Rough Guide to Greece. House practices criminal defense law from Garden Court Chambers, Lincoln's Inn Fields, in London, and hopes that if he keeps on practicing, he may eventually get the hang of it. His yet unachieved ambitions are: to farm alpacas; see Tibet liberated from the Chinese jackboot; and live to see Britain a socialist republic. (Author Head Shot Augment: René Laanen.)

3 Comments

  • eboleman-herring

    I remember, back in Philosophy 101, at the Univ. of Ga., being assigned a koan-like problem to solve: Can God create an immovable stone? The answer came to me in the shower later that day (shades of Luther on his “throne”): it was all a question/problem of semantics. Another problem, Can God create an infallible pontiff? is hoist on a similar semantic petard. According to Xtian dogma, there is only one infallible one (albeit three-in-one), and no part of “him” is pontiff, last I looked. I know, Michael, that you and C. Hitchens and Bill Maher would have us throw out all religion(s), hook, line, sinker and stinkers. I’d just like to BEGIN with the stinkers. . .and what, patently, stinks most. The Pope must go. Celibacy for the priesthood must go. That’ll be a good start. The Greek Orthodox were always on the right side of the Great Schism: all Patriarchs are equal; none is “more equal” than the others; and all are human, not infallible. The current occupant of the Patriarchy in Istanbul speaks very rationally on this topic. . .
    Keep polemicizing, though: we need you.
    Best,
    Elisavet

  • Kurt Helstrom

    Regarding this article in which the author wonders why people don’t react to the cover-up of priestly misconduct, I would like to comment that a possible reason is there are so many wrongs to consider, where do we properly place our outrage? Everyday there is something new, today it’s the oil devastating the gulf, yesterday it was Goldman Sachs betting on mortgages to fail, and on and on, etc, etc. Regrettably, it is easier to become indifferent than to be constantly in a state of outrage. Today there is a rally against Wall St, but it’s out of the way and I have to pick up the kids…..

  • eboleman-herring

    Hi, Kurt,
    Couldn’t agree with you more. I think the solution is for all of us to pay attention to/take on at least one cause. We used to have clubs in this country–The Lions, The Moose, etc.–and we now need NEW clubs. We have to begin somewhere. Amnesty International, Doctors Without Borders, labor unions—some of the “new clubs” already exist: we need to choose our causes/battles. . .and get to work.
    Thanks for supporting Hubris, too, by the way!
    Best,
    Elizabeth