Hubris

Becoming Bulletproof

Dolors & Sense

by Sanford Rose

KISSIMMEE Florida—(Weekly Hubris)—7/11/11—There are no guarantees, but we have a much better chance with a vest made from a fabric of certain cytokines.

Let’s recapitulate. Evolution engineered us for life through the reproductive years. Anything beyond those years was a mere lagniappe.

The principal threat to life in the early years was, and probably still is, infection.

So, evolution endowed us with cytokines—a set of cellular messengers that are quick to mobilize immunological agents.

We inflame very fast.

Inflammation is good when you’re young. It enables you to destroy invading pathogens.

But that which is good when you’re young can be bad when you’re old.

Nature, fixated on reproduction, had less regard for protecting those who managed to survive well beyond the reproductive years.

Those cytokines that fought pathogens with acute needed inflammation in our youth elicited low-level, chronic, unwanted inflammatory responses in our maturity.

Such responses are grouped under the heading of “metabolic syndrome.”

Read: insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, hypertension, colon carcinoma, and Alzheimer’s Disease—all of which are caused by persistent inflammation traceable to the perverse antics of cytokines and their macrophagic adjuvants.

The principal cytokines are tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1, and interleukin-6. They are found or “expressed” in most areas of the body, but seem to have a particular predilection for fat tissue.

But nature, averse to being predictable, has back-flipped a tad. It is not completely indifferent to the needs of the mature.

Consider interleukin-6. When secreted in fat tissue, it inflames. But when secreted in skeletal muscle tissue, it switches roles and becomes an anti-inflammatory. It starts fighting metabolic syndrome. It wages war on TNF-alpha and IL-1.

What’s more, once called upon by muscular activity, interleukin-6 recruits the aid of interleukin-10. That worthy, in absolutely no doubt as to its function, is an unambiguous inflammation fighter—probably the most dedicated in the body.

The obvious moral of this recital is that if we behaves as nature originally engineered us—beings who had to keep flexing their skeletal muscles vigorously in order to survive—we can achieve a reasonable balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and thus head off the scourge of our time (and, by the way, the leading consumer of our health-care dollars) —the dreaded metabolic syndrome.

Anyone for the weight bench?

Sanford Rose, of New Jersey and Florida, served as Associate Editor of Fortune Magazine from 1968 till 1972; Vice President of Chase Manhattan Bank in 1972; Senior Editor of Fortune between 1972 and 1979; and Associate Editor, Financial Editor and Senior Columnist of American Banker newspaper between 1979 and 1991. From 1991 till 2001, Rose worked as a consultant in the banking industry and a professional ghost writer in the field of finance. He has also taught as an adjunct professor of banking at Columbia University and an adjunct instructor of economics at New York University. He states that he left gainful employment in 2001 to concentrate on gain-less investing. (A lifelong photo-phobe, Rose also claims that the head shot accompanying his Weekly Hubris columns is not his own, but belongs, instead, to a skilled woodworker residing in South Carolina.)

3 Comments

  • Susan Herbst-Murphy

    Mr. Rose, my question may pertain to a time you have left far behind. I have a Word file full of interesting observations which I have plucked from published articles over the years. Unfortunately, in the beginning, I wasn’t very good at keeping track of dates and titles. One such snippet I believe is yours and came from the American Banker: Old formula for value = quality/price. New formula: Value = Quality+Time+Control+Ego/Price. I would like to use this in a presentation I am preparing and also build on it to include things like fraud protection (security) and green attributes as part of the consideration in price paid. I am looking for a citation for the originally published formula. Does this look familiar to you?

  • srose

    Susan:
    Regret that I have written nothing so imaginative in either the recent or remote past. I contented myself, so far as I remember, with bland and prosaic observations about the nexus between valuation and both the minimally required rate of return and the growth of earnings.
    Sorry I can’t be of more assistance.
    Best wishes
    Sanford Rose